DDemur Full Outline Library →
Free template — corporate representative

The 30(b)(6) deposition: the entity speaks through one person.

The representative’s job is to know nothing personal and everything corporate. That makes every “I don’t know” a choice the entity made — and choices can be read back to the jury.

The witness’s answers bind the organization, and the organization had a duty to prepare them. That asymmetry is the whole deposition: every gap in the witness’s knowledge is either an admission about the entity or a second deposition. Mark which, out loud, as you go.

The five objectives

01

Preparation. Every document, person, and dataset they reviewed — and who chose what they saw.

02

Bind the entity. Policies in force on the date of loss, the training requirement, and whether it was followed.

03

The notice chain. Who knew what, when — the complaint log, the incident report, the prior similar incidents.

04

The gap between policy and practice. The written standard vs. what the staffing schedule actually allowed.

05

Documents that should exist. The missing logs, the overwritten footage, the retention policy that says they shouldn’t be missing.

Why it works: an unprepared representative is not a dead end — it is evidence. The entity chose this person and chose what they reviewed. When the answers aren’t there, the preparation is the story, and juries understand a company that didn’t bother to find out.

After the deposition: audit the coverage

An outline is a contract, not an aspiration. After the examination, mark each objective covered or open — against the transcript, not against memory. The Deposition Grader runs that audit free, in your browser: paste the transcript, list these topics, and see what actually got covered.

The other five templates

Common questions

What is a 30(b)(6) deposition?

A deposition of the organization itself, speaking through a designated representative whose answers bind the entity. Florida state practice uses the analogous corporate-representative rule, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.310(b)(6).

What do you do when the representative says “I don’t know”?

Mark out loud which of two things it is: an admission that the entity failed to prepare its witness on a noticed topic, or a topic that requires a second, better-prepared witness. Either one is a win.

What should a 30(b)(6) deposition outline cover?

Five objectives: the witness’s preparation and who chose it, binding the entity to its policies on the date of loss, the notice chain, the gap between written policy and actual practice, and the documents that should exist but don’t.

The live version

An outline is a plan. Demur is the co-pilot that flies it.

These objectives track on paper. The live product tracks them against the examination as it happens — every objective marked covered or still open, every non-answer flagged with its source page, while the witness can still respond.